Archive for the 'San Diego Luxury Homes' Category
Luxury Real Estate Exchanges
This is a market that sometimes brings out the creative forces in real estate. And more and more, real estate exchanges are making lots of sense in the luxury real estate market.
Earlier this evening, I had an interesting conversation with a Sotheby’s real estate agent in Northern California.
It seems he is interested in exchanging his exquisite 104 acre property just outside Carmel for a luxury home in Rancho Santa Fe, just outside San Diego. His acreage offers 380 organic citrus trees that supply local restaurants, two greenhouses that produce basil for Whole Foods markets, Zinfandel grape vines that go you-know-where, and a number of fat and field-fed Angus cattle. He also has plans for an exquisite Tuscan villa that might be built for $1.5 million.
He is seeking to move to Southern California, and to Rancho Santa Fe in particular. And knowing that Rancho Santa Fe property owners love privacy, space and quiet, he thought that perhaps an easy and compatible exchange might be accomplished.
The numbers are certainly workable. He owes less than $800,000 on this parcel, in which he has invested nearly $3 million. He is seeking a Rancho Santa Fe home valued at $1.5 to $2.8 million–and may or may not be accomplishing the transaction via a 1031 exchange.
Quite simply, Northern California landowner wishes to relocate to Rancho Santa Fe and figures that some homeowner there would love the opportunity to exchange properties with him.
Makes sense to me.
So, if you have a Rancho Santa Fe home and have dreams of a bucolic life outside Carmel and California’s premier wine country, please let me know and I’ll arrange for a proper introduction. Just give us a call at 877-818-81979 or 760-402-9101.
And if you have an unusual luxury home exchange proposal of any sort, we’d also like to hear from you!
read comments (0)A Radical Proposition for Real Estate
by Roberta Murphy
I really want to talk about the effect petroleum costs will have on real estate, but first wish to tell a little story:
My grandgather, Adolph Michelson emigrated at the age of 7 with his family from Norway to Deadwood, South Dakota. It required a long, hard journey by steamship. train and wagon to arrive at their eventual home in the steep hills above Deadwood. It was there that they lived with other immigrants and Indians, sharing magnificent views and boot camp workouts as they trudged up and down that steep, steep hill to get to town for work, school, food and other supplies.
Views be damned. This was where the poor people lived.
As soon as the Michelson family could afford to do so, they moved their big family into a home in town, where shopping, school and employment were within easy walking distance. Their decision to move was not based on home features, the quality of the stove, or the number of closets–or even neighborhood amenities. It was based on that single and most basic real estate dynamic:
LOCATION
It is only since the advent of sprawling suburbias and each family having multiple automobiles that we strayed from distinct town and country living. The wealthy may have had homes in both locations, but the average family lived near employment . There were no school buses (or video games because kids had to hike through miles of rain and snow to get to school each day) and gasoline stations were pretty rare at the turn of the that other century. Which all leads me to wonder….
What might be the top priority for the home of the future when gas prices reach $6, $8, $10 or even $12 per gallon?
How about the radical choice of living walking-close to employment, shopping and schools? Or living near a bus stop or transit center where one can commute for work, school and fun?
I am eying real estate differently these days–and am coming around to my ancestor’s way of thinking. Location trumps views, walkable sidewalks trump big back yards and a bicycle pump beats a gas pump–at least for kids who drive or are driven to school (ever seen the long lines of mini vans idling outside our schools at arrival and departure times–or high school parking lots?). Might a more urban lifestyle offer some solutions that would allow for a saner lifestyle?
I am also wondering if Carol Lloyd’s prediction of suburbs turning into Slumburbia might also come true–sooner rather than later due to rising fuel costs? In her SF Gate article, she notes, “In Europe, where the cities never died, the suburbs have long been the homes of last resort for the poor and the marginalized.” This is already occurring in and around sprawling urban centers like Houston, where home prices in and close to downtown Houston are selling at a premium, while homes in once-affluent suburbs are selling at prices far below replacement costs. It is a scenario being repeated all over the country, with slightly different configurations along the coasts.
In San Diego County, where I live and work, we are anecdotally seeing a surge of buyers seeking to live within walking distance of restaurants, theaters, dry cleaners and food or farmer’s markets. They no longer want to battle freeway gridlock, and would happily trade their road warrior status for the peace of riding a train to work. They are also seeking more open communities, where neighbors stroll by and greet one another, where not so much of life is lived in and for cars–or behind mortgaged garage doors.
I am so, so tempted to join them….
It appears that even the luxury real estate market will not fully escape the financial ravages that are taking down less-expensive neighborhoods.
Housing Wire asks: Has REO gone jumbo? To find out, they consulted with Integrated Asset Services, LLC in Colorado to see if foreclosures are moving up the real estate food chain. And though not all properties with loans in excess of the the conforming $417,000 are luxury homes, it appears that an increasing number of residences in that loftier lending arena are heading to short sale or foreclosure. In California, for example, IAS and Housing Wire saw 102 REO’s sell for more than $417,000 during April, compared to just 13 in April, 2007.
Anecdotally, we have seen a spike this past year in San Diego luxury homes that are closing as short sales (where more is owed on the property than what it is worth), or which end up as foreclosures and REO’s (real estate owned bank properties). We have also seen that it takes lenders far longer to reach an agreeable sales price compared to smaller loans–and that may be understandable.
On one hand, more money is at stake and greater care must be taken in reaching a fair valuation; on the other, carrying costs (taxes, insurance, maintenance, security and HOA fees) run far higher than ordinary REO’s. And that those are bills most lenders and services do not want to shoulder.
In a recent transaction in coastal Encinitas Ranch, Washington Mutual required two appraisals and took almost four months processing time before reaching an agreed-upon sales price. And during that time, foreclosure sale was delayed twice. The original loan amount was $1.2 million and the final sales price was $880,000. It was a major hit for the lender/investor , but costs would surely have been greater if this Encinitas home had gone to foreclosure.
We are currently involved with two other sellers who have loans exceeding $1 million and whose custom homes could end up as foreclosures if Countrywide and First Franklin investors cannot come up with pricing that reflects current San Diego market realities. Neither home is coastal (which would help prop up valuation) and neither have area comparable sales that would support pricing anywhere near what is owed on these homes.
Outside of our San Diego real estate practice with Villa Sotheby’s International Realty in Del Mar, we are hearing whispers that there will be more luxury short sales and REO’s before the real estate market recovers. And out of the confusion and delays in disposing of these luxury properties will be opportunities that luxury investors have been long awaiting.
And even the ultra-luxury real estate market appears to be experiencing some correction. In 2006, we wrote about Donald Trump’s luxury estate in Palm Beach being offered at $125 million. Recent reports say it sold at just $100 million.
What may have been painful for The Donald would have been a coup for the lucky buyer. I guess every market has silver linings–for someone.
Nouveau Luxury Home Buyers: Instapreneurs
Who are these young and ultra-affluent buyers of homes in Rancho Santa Fe, Palm Beach, La Jolla, Aspen and Manhattan?
Robert Frank, in his best-seller Richistan, calls them instapreneurs (didn’t he coin the term?).
These are the new titans in technologies, who have benefited from a rise in financial speculation and governments that support free trade and wealth.
Instapreneurs are not plodders when it comes to accumulating wealth. They don’t develop companies to last for family generation; rather, they may launch several companies over their career life spans. And the goal for each venture is a lucrative “exit strategy” that will create the fattest windfall possible.
What are these luxury buyers seeking when searching for their trophy home?
1. They are specific in their demands as to age of property, views, room volume, luxury closets, privacy, and entertaining areas.
2. Instapreneurs often wish to be near prestigious country clubs, where they can golf, play tennis and entertain business elite.
3. In San Diego, many of these nouveau uber-wealthy demand ocean frontage, ocean noise–and silent streets. Or the highest penthouse in downtown San Diego. The want what is rare, what is singular.
4. Instapreneurs often have children, and are concerned about the quality of nearby and private schools. How the home works for the kids can be of keen importance. Instaprenerual parents want safety, space and room for kiddie galas.
5. These luxury home buyers often have special room requests, such as a library, multiple offices, servant quarters, guest houses, snoring rooms, home gyms, massage rooms, a conservatory or even a panic room.
6. These busy people often demand to be not far from a major airport because of frequent travel demands and the desire to minimize time spent away from families.
We enjoy working with these interesting folk, not just because we enjoy finding perfect property fits, but also because of the stories we get to hear. Some have been scientists, some movers and shakers in technology, and some who just had the courage to pour everything they had into an idea whose time had come.
They all inspire and the world is a better place because of these producers.
Is Hacking a Restraint of Trade–or a Vicious Crime?
Deepest apologies to those of you who were unable to access Luxury Home Digest this past week.
It seems we were the victim of a malevolent hacking attack last Sunday night, whereby all of our content was deleted–on not only Luxury Home Digest, but San Diego Previews as well. Thanks to the tireless work of blogging gurus at the Real Estate Tomato, we have been able to restore most of our material.
And thanks to those who brought this site and our San Diego real estate blogsite down, I am now musing about the consequences for such actions.
Is attacking a website and deleting its content a crime? And if more than one attacker, a conspiracy?
Could such activity constitute a “restraint of trade” as defined by the Federal Trade Commission? Google definitions, as usual, provide some clues:
1. Descriptive of unreasonable acts or contracts which prevent a person from carrying on, or engaging in, their profession.
www.aapa.org/manual/judicial/glossary.html
2. Combinations, contracts, or other oral or written arrangements designed to establish a monopoly position, impede competition, fix prices, or prevent entry by potential rivals. …
www.itcdonline.com/introduction/glossary2_q-z.html
3. Monopolies, combinations, and contracts that impede free competition.
www.crfonline.org/orc/glossary/r.html
4. Any act that tends to prevent free competition in business
wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
5. Restraint of trade is a restriction on a person’s freedom to conduct business in a specified or unspecified location for a specified or unspecified length of time. Such restrictions are normally enacted by contracts. …
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restraint of trade
Yes, our San Diego real estate business was impeded, and we were prevented from carrying on in our profession in a normal manner. Clients were unable to search for San Diego properties on our sites and we were blocked from our online business for several days. Searchers for luxury home news were certainly forced to go elsewhere when we were offline.
And if restraint of trade is “any act that tends to prevent free competition in business,” or places “a restriction on a person’s freedom to conduct business in a specified or unspecified location for a specified or unspecified length of time,” then restraint of trade is what I will politely and publicly call last Sunday night’s massacre.
Under my breath, though, other expletives words and descriptions are uttered.…
